Apache2::SubProcess (3)
Leading comments
Automatically generated by Pod::Man 4.09 (Pod::Simple 3.35) Standard preamble: ========================================================================
NAME
Apache2::SubProcess -- Executing SubProcesses under mod_perlSynopsis
use Apache2::SubProcess (); use Config; use constant PERLIO_IS_ENABLED => $Config{useperlio}; # pass @ARGV / read from the process $command = "/tmp/argv.pl"; @argv = qw(foo bar); $out_fh = $r->spawn_proc_prog($command, \@argv); $output = read_data($out_fh); # pass environment / read from the process $command = "/tmp/env.pl"; $r->subprocess_env->set(foo => "bar"); $out_fh = $r->spawn_proc_prog($command); $output = read_data($out_fh); # write to/read from the process $command = "/tmp/in_out_err.pl"; ($in_fh, $out_fh, $err_fh) = $r->spawn_proc_prog($command); print $in_fh "hello\n"; $output = read_data($out_fh); $error = read_data($err_fh); # helper function to work w/ and w/o perlio-enabled Perl sub read_data { my ($fh) = @_; my $data; if (PERLIO_IS_ENABLED || IO::Select->new($fh)->can_read(10)) { $data = <$fh>; } return defined $data ? $data : ''; } # pass @ARGV but don't ask for any communication channels $command = "/tmp/argv.pl"; @argv = qw(foo bar); $r->spawn_proc_prog($command, \@argv);
Description
"Apache2::SubProcess" provides the PerlAt the moment it's possible to spawn only external program in a new process. It's possible to provide other interfaces, e.g. executing a sub-routine reference (via "B::Deparse") and may be spawn a new program in a thread (since the
API
spawn_proc_prog
Spawn a sub-process and return
$r->spawn_proc_prog($command); $r->spawn_proc_prog($command, \@argv); $out_fh = $r->spawn_proc_prog($command); $out_fh = $r->spawn_proc_prog($command, \@argv); ($in_fh, $out_fh, $err_fh) = $r->spawn_proc_prog($command); ($in_fh, $out_fh, $err_fh) = $r->spawn_proc_prog($command, \@argv);
- obj: $r ( Apache2::RequestRec object )
- arg1: $command ( string )
- The command to be "$exec()"'ed.
- opt arg2: \@argv ( ARRAYref )
- A reference to an array of arguments to be passed to the process as the process' "ARGV".
- ret: ...
-
In VOIDcontext returns no filehandles (all std streams to the spawned process are closed).
In
SCALARcontext returns the output filehandle of the spawned process (the in and err std streams to the spawned process are closed).In
LISTcontext returns the input, outpur and error filehandles of the spawned process. - since: 2.0.00
It's possible to pass environment variables as well, by calling:
$r->subprocess_env->set($key => $value);
before spawning the subprocess.
There is an issue with reading from the read filehandle ($in_fh)):
A pipe filehandle returned under perlio-disabled Perl needs to call select() if the other end is not fast enough to send the data, since the read is non-blocking.
A pipe filehandle returned under perlio-enabled Perl on the other hand does the select() internally, because it's really a filehandle opened via ":APR" layer, which internally uses
Therefore to write a portable code, you want to use select for perlio-disabled Perl and do nothing for perlio-enabled Perl, hence you can use something similar to the "read_data()" wrapper shown in the Synopsis section.
Several examples appear in the Synopsis section.
"spawn_proc_prog()" is similar to "fork()", but provides you a better framework to communicate with that process and handles the cleanups for you. But that means that just like "fork()" it gives you a different process, so you don't use the current Perl interpreter in that new process. If you try to use that method or fork to run a high-performance parallel processing you should look elsewhere. You could try Perl threads, but they are very expensive to start if you have a lot of things loaded into memory (since "perl_clone()" dups almost everything in the perl land, but the opcode tree). In the mod_perl ``paradigm'' this is much more expensive than fork, since normally most of the time we have lots of perl things loaded into memory. Most likely the best solution here is to offload the job to PPerl or some other daemon, with the only added complexity of communication.
To spawn a completely independent process, which will be able to run after Apache has been shutdown and which won't prevent Apache from restarting (releasing the ports Apache is listening to) call spawn_proc_prog() in a void context and make the script detach and close/reopen its communication streams. For example, spawn a process as:
use Apache2::SubProcess (); $r->spawn_proc_prog ('/path/to/detach_script.pl', $args);
and the /path/to/detach_script.pl contents are:
# file:detach_script.pl #!/usr/bin/perl -w use strict; use warnings; use POSIX 'setsid'; chdir '/' or die "Can't chdir to /: $!"; open STDIN, '/dev/null' or die "Can't read /dev/null: $!"; open STDOUT, '+>>', '/path/to/apache/error_log' or die "Can't write to /dev/null: $!"; open STDERR, '>&STDOUT' or die "Can't dup stdout: $!"; setsid or die "Can't start a new session: $!"; # run your code here or call exec to another program
reopening (or closing) the